TPRM maturity check: Take the check
Trestec
La Défense business district, Paris

EBA Outsourcing Guidelines

Governance and risk expectations for outsourcing arrangements.

Overview

The EBA Guidelines on outsourcing arrangements (EBA/GL/2019/02) set governance and risk expectations for outsourcing by banks, investment firms, payment institutions and e-money institutions.

They applied from 30 September 2019 and replaced the 2006 CEBS guidelines on outsourcing and the EBA’s 2017 recommendation on outsourcing to cloud service providers.

The guidelines are organised in titles covering proportionality and group application, the assessment of outsourcing arrangements, the governance framework, the outsourcing process (pre-outsourcing analysis, contractual phase, oversight and exit) and expectations for competent authorities.

A central concept is the critical or important function. Outsourcing of such functions attracts the fullest requirements, including detailed contractual terms, notification to the competent authority and documented exit strategies.

Applies to

  • Credit institutions and investment firms subject to the CRD (as at 2019); investment firms should check how the guidelines apply to them since the Investment Firms Directive
  • Payment institutions and electronic money institutions
  • Competent authorities, for their supervision of outsourcing
  • Arrangements within groups and institutional protection schemes, applied on an individual, sub-consolidated and consolidated basis

Relevant jurisdictions

Scope and applicability

Confirm the requirements that apply to your entity, the service and the arrangement before selecting the depth of review. How the rules apply depends on your entity.

Key dates

25 February 2019

Guidelines published

30 September 2019

Guidelines apply

First renewal or revision

Existing arrangements reviewed and amended to comply

31 December 2021

Deadline to complete documentation of existing arrangements; competent authority to be informed where reviews of critical or important arrangements were unfinished

17 January 2025

DORA applies to ICT third party arrangements of financial entities

Inside the regulation

Structure of the guidelines

Title I covers proportionality and the application of the guidelines within groups and institutional protection schemes. Title II covers the assessment of outsourcing arrangements: whether an arrangement is outsourcing, and whether it concerns a critical or important function.

Title III (Sections 5 to 11) covers the governance framework, including sound governance and third party risk, the outsourcing policy, conflicts of interest, business continuity plans, the internal audit function and documentation requirements, including the outsourcing register.

Title IV covers the outsourcing process: pre-outsourcing analysis (supervisory conditions, risk assessment and due diligence), the contractual phase (sub-outsourcing, security of data and systems, access, information and audit rights, and termination rights), oversight of outsourced functions, and exit strategies. Title V is addressed to competent authorities.

The outsourcing register

For every arrangement the register records, among other items, a reference number, start and renewal dates, a description of the function and data involved, the category of the function, the provider’s name and registration details, the country where the service is performed and data stored, whether the function is critical or important, the date of the last criticality assessment, whether personal data is involved, the parent company, and cloud service and deployment models where relevant.

For critical or important functions, additional information includes the institutions and group entities using the service, whether the provider is part of the group, the date and main results of the most recent risk assessment, who approved the arrangement, the governing law, the dates of the last and next audits, sub-outsourcers, the substitutability of the provider, alternative providers, whether the function supports time-critical business operations, and the estimated annual budget cost.

Interaction with DORA

From 17 January 2025, DORA sets specific requirements for ICT third party arrangements of financial entities, including the register of information and the contractual provisions in Article 30. For institutions in scope of both, ICT outsourcing arrangements must meet DORA, and the EBA Guidelines continue to apply to non-ICT outsourcing.

On 18 September 2026 the EBA published final Guidelines on the sound management of third-party risk regarding non-ICT services (EBA/GL/2026/09). Once they apply, they will repeal the 2019 outsourcing guidelines. ICT arrangements covered by DORA fall outside them, and the application date has not yet been set.

Detailed requirements

01

Critical or important functions

Assess whether an outsourced function is critical or important: one whose defect or failure would materially impair continuing compliance with authorisation conditions, financial performance, or the soundness or continuity of services. Outsourcing operational tasks of internal control functions is treated as critical or important unless assessed otherwise.

02

Distinguishing outsourcing

Decide whether an arrangement is outsourcing at all: whether the provider performs a function that would otherwise be performed by the institution itself, on a recurrent or ongoing basis.

03

Governance and outsourcing policy

The management body approves and regularly reviews a written outsourcing policy covering responsibilities, the lifecycle of arrangements, intragroup outsourcing and exit. Outsourcing must not create an empty shell or letter-box entity.

04

Outsourcing register

Keep a register of all outsourcing arrangements, at individual and, where applicable, consolidated level, with additional information for critical or important functions. Make it available to the competent authority on request.

05

Pre-outsourcing analysis

Before outsourcing, assess whether the function is critical or important, whether supervisory conditions are met, the risks including concentration and step-in risk, conflicts of interest, and carry out due diligence on the provider.

06

Notification

Inform the competent authority in a timely manner of planned outsourcing of critical or important functions, and of material changes or severe events affecting those arrangements (exact timing depends on national rules).

07

Contractual terms

For critical or important functions, the written agreement sets out the function and services, start and end dates, notice periods, governing law, financial obligations, sub-outsourcing conditions, locations, data security, service levels, reporting, insurance, business continuity, access, information and audit rights, and termination rights.

08

Sub-outsourcing

Set whether and on what conditions critical or important functions may be sub-outsourced, with prior notification, a right to object and obligations flowed down to sub-outsourcers.

09

Access, information and audit rights

Secure full access and unrestricted audit rights for the institution, its auditors and the competent authority, including on-site access. Pooled audits and third party certifications can be used within limits.

10

Cloud outsourcing

Apply the guidelines to cloud arrangements, with particular attention to data and system security, data location and the risk-based approach to data storage and processing.

11

Oversight of outsourced functions

Monitor the performance of service providers on an ongoing basis, with a risk-based approach focused on critical or important functions, and report to the management body.

12

Exit strategies

Documented, sufficiently tested exit strategies for critical or important functions, covering termination, the failure of the provider and changes in service quality, with alternative solutions and transition plans.

How Trestec supports it

Requirement

Critical or important function assessment

How Trestec supports it

Consistent assessment with reasoning and approval

Requirement

Outsourcing register

How Trestec supports it

Central register of arrangements, owners and dates

Requirement

Pre-outsourcing due diligence

How Trestec supports it

Supplier portal, document checks and review

Requirement

Risk assessment of the arrangement

How Trestec supports it

Risk ratings traced to evidence

Requirement

Contractual terms

How Trestec supports it

Clause review against required terms

Requirement

Sub-outsourcing

How Trestec supports it

Subcontractors mapped and approvals tracked

Requirement

Cloud arrangements

How Trestec supports it

Cloud providers and shared infrastructure flagged

Requirement

Exit strategies

How Trestec supports it

Exit plans and testing records

Requirement

Ongoing monitoring

How Trestec supports it

Review dates, alerts and actions

Requirement

Access, information and audit rights

How Trestec supports it

Audit and access clauses identified and linked to the source page

Requirement

Notification of critical or important outsourcing

How Trestec supports it

Arrangements flagged as critical or important, with the steps and information needed for a notification

Requirement

Business continuity of providers

How Trestec supports it

Continuity and recovery evidence collected and tracked with review dates

Illustrative mapping, not a compliance determination.

Supervisory review: gaps to examine

Illustrative review questions, not findings from a supervisor.

Register out of date

New or changed arrangements not recorded promptly.

Cloud treated separately

Cloud contracts held outside the main register.

Criticality not revisited

Assessments not refreshed when the service changes.

Exit plans missing

No documented exit for critical or important functions.

Outsourcing not distinguished

No documented reasoning on whether an arrangement is outsourcing or another third party arrangement.

Sub-outsourcing unapproved

Providers sub-outsource critical or important functions without notice or the right to object.

Audit rights limited

Contracts restrict access or audit by the institution or the competent authority.

Intragroup arrangements undocumented

Group outsourcing lacks written agreements or a risk assessment.

Evidence you can produce

  • Outsourcing register
  • Criticality assessments
  • Pre-outsourcing analysis
  • Contract term reviews
  • Sub-outsourcing approvals
  • Cloud arrangement records
  • Exit strategies
  • Monitoring and review logs
  • Outsourcing policy approved by the management body
  • Notifications to the competent authority

Common questions

See Trestec on your own supplier list.